Burnley Take On Man United in Key English Top Division Match
-
- By Mark Medina
- 03 Mar 2026
In the eyes of Natalia Molina and third-generation Mexican American, the crowning moment of the World Series didn't occur during the tense final game on Saturday, when her team pulled off one death-defying escape feat after another and then winning in overtime over the Toronto Blue Jays.
It came in the previous game, when two supporting athletes, the Puerto Rican player and the Venezuelan infielder, pulled off a electrifying, game-winning sequence that at the same time upended numerous harmful misconceptions touted about Hispanic people in recent years.
The moment in itself was stunning: the outfielder charged in from the outfield to snag a ball he initially lost in the bright lights, then threw it to second base to secure another, game-winning out. the second baseman, at second base, caught the ball just a split second before a opposing player barreled into him, sending him to the ground.
This wasn't merely a remarkable athletic achievement, possibly the key turn in momentum in the team's favor after looking for most of the games like the weaker side. For Molina, it was thrilling, on multiple levels, a badly needed uplift for Latinos and for the city after a period of immigration raids, security forces patrolling the streets, and a steady stream of negativity from national leaders.
"Kike and Miggy put forth this alternative story," explained Molina. "The world saw Latinos showing an infectious pride and joy in what they do, being key figures on the team, exhibiting a different kind of masculinity. They're bombastic, they're cheering, they're taking off their shirts."
"It was such a juxtaposition with what we see on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos thrown to the ground and pursued. It is so simple to be demoralized these days."
Not that it's entirely simple to be a Dodgers supporter these days – for her or for the many of other Latinos who attend faithfully to home games and fill up as many as half of the stadium's 50,000 seats per game.
After intensified immigration raids began in Los Angeles in early June, and military troops were sent into the area to respond to resulting demonstrations, two of the city's sports clubs quickly issued statements of solidarity with affected communities – but not the baseball team.
The team president stated the Dodgers prefer to stay away of politics – a view influenced, possibly, by the reality that a sizable portion of the fans, even some Hispanic fans, are supporters of current political figures. After considerable external demands, the team subsequently committed $one million in aid for individuals personally impacted by the raids but issued no public condemnation of the administration.
Three months earlier, the organization did not delay in agreeing to an invitation to celebrate their previous championship win at the White House – a move that sports writers labeled as "pathetic … weak … and contradictory", given the Dodgers' pride in having been the pioneering professional team to break the color barrier in the 1940s and the frequent invocations of that history and the principles it represents by executives and current and former players. A number of players including the manager had voiced unwillingness to travel to the White House during the first term but either reconsidered or gave in to demands from the organization.
An additional complication for supporters is that the team are owned by a large investment group, the ownership group, whose equity holdings, according to sources and its own published financial documents, involve a stake in a detention company that operates enforcement centers. The group's executives has said repeatedly that it wants to remain neutral of political matters, but its critics say the silence – and the financial stake – are their own type of acquiescence to current agendas.
All of that add up to considerable mixed feelings among Hispanic fans in particular – sentiments that surfaced even in the excitement of this year's hard-won World Series triumph and the following outpouring of Dodgers pride across Los Angeles.
"Can one to support the team?" local writer Erick Galindo agonized at the beginning of the playoffs in an elegant essay pondering on "team loyalty in our blood, but doubt in our minds". He couldn't finally bring himself to watch the championship, but he still felt strongly, to the point that he decided his personal protest must have brought the team the luck it required to succeed.
Many supporters who have Galindo's misgivings seem to have decided that they can keep to back the players and its roster of global players, featuring the Asian superstar Shohei Ohtani, while expressing disdain on the team's corporate overlords. Nowhere was this more clear than at the championship parade at the home venue on the following day, when the capacity crowd cheered in approval of the coach and his players but booed the team president and the top official of the ownership group.
"These men in formal attire do not get to take our boys in blue from us," the fan said. "We have been with the team for more time than they have."
The problem, however, goes further than just the team's current owners. The deal that brought the Brooklyn Dodgers to Los Angeles in the 1950s involved the municipality demolishing three working-class Latino communities on a hill overlooking downtown and then transferring the land to the organization for a fraction of its market value. A track on a 2005 album that chronicles the events has an low-income parking attendant at the stadium revealing that the home he forfeited to eviction is now third base.
A prominent commentator, perhaps the region's most influential Mexican American writer and broadcaster, sees a darker side to the lengthy, problematic dynamic between the team and its audience. He calls the team the popular snack of baseball, "a business organization with an undue, even unhealthy following by too many Latinos" that has been exploiting its supporters for decades.
"They have put one arm around Hispanic fans while profiting from them with the other for so much time because they have been able to avoid consequences," Arellano wrote over the summer, when calls to avoid the team over its lack of response to the raids were upended by the awkward reality that turnout at home games did not dip, even at the height of the demonstrations when downtown LA was subject to a nightly curfew.
Distinguishing the team from its corporate owners is not a easy matter, {
A seasoned journalist with a passion for uncovering stories that matter in the Czech Republic and beyond.